Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Affluent German couple sues for permanent residency

Affluent German couple sues for permanent residency

A German couple is suing the chairperson of the immigration selection board and the chief of immigration over their refusal to grant them permanent residence in Namibia.

The couple, who say they fell in love with Namibia and its peace-loving people during their frequent visits, wants the high court to set aside and review a decision by immigration to refuse them a permanent residence permit for allegedly not owning any fixed assets in Namibia. 

Christian Wilhelm and Stepanie Knoche assert that they own two properties in Namibia – a villa at Harmony Mountain Village, valued at N$3 million, and a property in Swakopmund, valued at N$2 million. 

They said the reasons for the refusal of immigration to grant them permanent residency in Namibia is without merit and preposterous.

Knoche, who is a retired lawyer, and his wife, who is a doctor in radiology, claim that they will not depend on government programmes to sustain them, as they are well-endowed and capable of looking after themselves. 

They claim that they have more than enough means to aid needy Namibian families, should the need arise. 

Papers filed at the high court by their lawyer Sisa Namandje state that the decision of the board is primarily based on the assumption that they do not possess property in Namibia, and the fear that they will depend on government programmes to sustain themselves, which is far-fetched. 

They have liquid assets in their respective bank accounts of more than N$5 million. 

In addition, they have a property in Germany, valued at N$19.4 million, which they rent out. 

They said the assumption of immigration that they will leech on Namibia is absurd, to say the least. 

The board gravely misconstrued and misapplied the section they relied on to reject their application, the couple further argued. 

They state that the section does not mention that a person applying for permanent residency in Namibia must have fixed property, and such a requirement would be unreasonable, irrational and absurd in circumstances where a person applying for permanent residency should do so whilst still outside the country. 

“It is, therefore, clear that the board did not only misconstrue and misapply the section, but also failed to apply its mind. 

“It, in fact, unlawfully introduced a requirement when it has no right whatsoever to create and apply a condition/requirement which is inconsistent and ultra vires the section,” they argued. 

They are, thus, asking the high court for an order reviewing, correcting and setting aside the decision of the board to refuse them a permanent residence permit, and the subsequent decision to reject their appeal. 

They further ask for an order declaring that the immigration board has no power to impose conditions and requirements that are inconsistent with the Immigration Control Act as well as an order that the immigration board’s requirement that the applicants must have sufficient assets and/or immovable assets in Namibia is unlawful, and must be set aside. 

They are also asking for costs. 

The board is defending the action, and is represented by Wana Chinsembu, on instructions of the government attorney. 

The case is presided over by Windhoek High Court Acting Judge Collins Parker.

-rrouth@nepc.com.na