Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ancestral land commission an election gimmick – Rukoro

Home National Ancestral land commission an election gimmick – Rukoro

WINDHOEK – Ovaherero Paramount Chief, Advocate Vekuii Rukoro has described the Presidential Commission of Inquiry on Ancestral Land Claims as an election gimmick.
Rukoro claims the commission will disappear after this year’s Presidential and National Assembly elections slated for November.

The commission of inquiry was established by President Hage Geingob earlier this year as part of the resolutions of the second national land, conference held last year to investigate claims of ancestral land and restitution, and make appropriate recommendations for implementation.

But Rukoro, who boycotted the land conference last year, said government’s real intention with the commission is clear even to the politically blind, and that is the reason why he is boycotting its activities.
“To us the Nama and Ovaherero people, the issue of ancestral land can only be discussed within the context of the genocide committed by Germany against our parents,” said Rukoro, while accompanied by Chief Johannes Isaack of the Nama Traditional Leaders Association (NTLA) at a joined-press briefing here yesterday.

“I repeat, ancestral land loss should not be for those who did not lose ancestral land to colonial rule at all. Otherwise this would be, for example, a person who lay charges to the police for his stolen car whilst he still has it,” he said.

He said as long as government is selling land to the Chinese, Russia and Mexicans and both President Geingob and Prime Minister Saara-Kuugongelwa-Amadhila do not prohibit foreigners to acquire land in Namibia, including Erindi, and then it is clear to them that foreign interest with money can buy the whole of Namibia.

“Let’s not be fooled at all, there is nothing of interest or benefit to Namibia if one foreigner who already owns our land (a South African) sells his land to yet another foreigner (Mexican),” he said, warning that if Mexican billionaire investor Alberto Baillères invest his money in Erindi, he will end-up losing his investment as Erindi is part of the ancestral land.

Rukoro says he is baffled as to what exactly President Geingob has in mind when one carefully analyses a number of the terms of references of the commission.

“A case in point is that ordinary words like ‘secretary’, ‘chairman’ and ‘inquiry’ are defined in the proclamation, whilst words like ‘ancestral land’, ‘affected parties’ and ‘restitution’, – which are at the heart of the inquiry are nowhere defined,” he said.

“For example who are the ‘affected parties’ in the context of the commission ancestral land,” he questioned, adding this was deliberate political connived omission consistent with the objective of dirtying the water for true claimant of lost ancestral lands by deliberately opening floodgates.

Rukoro says their position is that every inch of the soil of what used to be an Independent Sovereign State of Hereroland and Namaqualand before colonization, would be their claim for ancestral land, just like any other independent sovereign states would do or are entitled to do under international laws.