Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Court exonerates stock theft accused after marathon trial

Home National Court exonerates stock theft accused after marathon trial

Steven Klukowski

KEETMANSHOOP- Magistrate Melissa Mungunda on Monday found three accused persons not guilty on charges of stock theft, seven years after their first court appearance in the Keetmanshoop Magistrate’s Court.

It has been previously alleged by the State that Antonius Swartz, Johannes Hangue, Hermanus Goagoseb (minor by that time) and Collin Brandt on 21 November 2012 at farm Wortel !Momexas in the Tses area, Keetmanshoop district unlawfully and intentionally stole stock, namely 12 goats valued at N$7 200.00 from Willem Barman which was the property and in lawful possession of him. The charge against the minor was however withdrawn at a later court appearance by the State.

According to court records, the remaining three accused persons then pleaded not guilty to the charges on 12 May 2016 whereby the matter has been remanded several times for reasons of unavailability and change of defence lawyers, public prosecutors and investigation officers being on leave, state witnesses not present and lastly the docket not available during these court appearances. 

“The law makes provision for the State to deem the State’s case to be closed if there is an unreasonably long delay and no good reasons are advanced for such delay,” Mungunda said during her ruling on 9 May 2019. She then postponed the matter until 22 July 2019 as a final remand for purposes of plea and trial.

During Monday’s court appearance, the State, represented by Frederick Van Der Colf informed the court that the docket was again not available since the current investigation officer, sergeant Moyo failed to obtain it. “I never had sight of this docket, neither was it under my control since I took over this case,” the investigating officer replied when probed by Magistrate Mungunda.

Defence lawyer Henry Van Zyl then requested the court that the three accused be discharged on all charges in terms of section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Act 51 of 1977), as there was no evidence before court, which can found them guilty.   

As the State did not oppose the defence’s submission, Magistrate Mungunda then finally ruled, finding the three accused persons not guilty and discharged them whilst also making a court order that bail monies should be refunded to the respective depositors.

Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Act 51 of 1977) makes provision to “protect the accused from being prosecuted, when in actual fact ‘no’ connection between them and the offence has been established whatsoever.”