There is a plethora of information available on various aspects of menstruation, but one critical issue often remains in the shadows: the association between menstruation, sanitary products, and certain diseases. While common period-related problems such as yeast infections, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and imbalanced pH levels are well-documented, there’s a less-discussed but potentially life-threatening condition known as toxic shock syndrome (TSS). Especially amongst women from underprivileged backgrounds. This rare but crucial topic warrants our attention, particularly given recent legislative dismissals related to providing sanitary items to underprivileged girls in Namibia.

Toxic shock syndrome is an uncommon yet severe infection that can rapidly lead to low blood pressure and even multiple organ failure. It occurs when a bacteria called Staphylococcus aureus, typically found in skin wounds or infections, enters the body and multiplies, releasing harmful toxins. While TSS can affect anyone, it is more prevalent among menstruating women who use tampons, particularly super-absorbent ones. The risk is heightened when tampons are worn for extended periods without being changed, or when overly absorbent tampons are used.

Prolonged tampon use creates an ideal environment for bacterial growth. In some cases, symptoms of TSS, such as vomiting and excessive diarrhoea, may be mistaken for regular period discomfort. However, if these symptoms deviate from your usual experience, it is crucial to seek medical attention promptly.

For regular tampon users, it is essential to change them every three to four hours, depending on your flow. While TSS is primarily associated with tampons and menstrual cups, it’s also vital to note that women and young girls who use pads should avoid wearing them for extended periods. This is especially significant in Namibia’s rural areas, where many young girls resort to makeshift solutions during their menstrual cycles, often missing school as a result.

The argument against prioritising young girls and providing them with sanitary items is disheartening, given the prevalent issue of period poverty in Namibia. Cases of women being unable to afford menstrual products or lacking the authority within their families to allocate a budget for such items continue to grow. In rural areas, young girls often resort to using unhygienic materials like old clothes, newspapers, and even toilet paper, which can lead to vaginal infections due to the presence of harmful chemicals and elements.

In light of these challenges, it is imperative to educate women about proper menstrual hygiene, but it is equally essential to meet young girls who lack access to sanitary items halfway. The dismissal of motions aimed at addressing this issue disregards the very real struggles faced by underprivileged girls in Namibia. By taking collective action and raising awareness about both TSS and the menstrual health inequities that persist, we can work towards a safer and healthier future for all women and girls.