Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Japan’s nuke wastewater a danger to world’s oceans

Home National Japan’s nuke wastewater a danger to world’s oceans
Japan’s nuke wastewater a danger to  world’s oceans

SEOUL – South Korea’s main opposition party said Japan’s planned discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean poses a serious threat to the world’s oceans.

“Many experts believe that the release of contaminated water into the ocean is an unprecedented event in history and will have a devastating impact on the health and lives of current and future generations,” said Wi Seong-gon, a Democratic Party lawmaker and chief of the party’s prevention committee.

In a press statement, Wi said the discharge of wastewater will violate Articles 192, 194, and 207 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which stipulates that the best methods should be used to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s report on the discharge cannot give Japan immunity for the release of contaminated water into the sea, as the report failed to verify the performance of the advanced liquid processing system (ALPS) and examine the long-term impact of the discharge on the marine ecosystem, said Wi.

According to Chu Chul-hyun, a Democratic Party lawmaker, the discharge into the ocean is not the only solution. Chu cited five disposal plans proposed in 2018 by the subcommittee on handling ALPS treated water, an advisory body under Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.

The proposed plans included geosphere injection, underground burial, hydrogen release, vapor release, and discharge into the ocean.

Woo Won-shik, a Democratic Party lawmaker who has been on a hunger strike for 11 days to protest against the Fukushima wastewater release, told the media that the first four options, other than the discharge option, will not harm any country outside of Japan despite higher costs.

“It is hard to understand for me why Japan wants to choose the discharge option harming the neighboring countries,” said Woo.

He said South Korean people had a big question in mind over why the United States said nothing about it, urging the international community to oppose the discharge together as it is a clear violation of international law and leaves a bad precedent in the history of humankind.

“If the contaminated water release is allowed this time, do we have to allow another discharge into the ocean every time similar accidents happen in the future? The international community has to answer it,” said Woo. -Nampa/XINHUA