Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Lawyer gets ‘friendly uncle’ off rape charge

Home National Lawyer gets ‘friendly uncle’ off rape charge
Lawyer gets ‘friendly uncle’ off rape charge

Roland Routh

Windhoek-based defence counsel Mbanga Siyomunji has successfully defended a Windhoek resident – referred to as a friendly uncle by the complainant – on a charge of rape in the Windhoek Regional Court.

Richardt Ucham was accused of raping a woman he claimed to have an intimate relationship with, which the woman (who may not be named to protect her identity) denied and accused him of raping her at his residence in Rocky Crest in Windhoek on 7 February 2021. 

The complainant told the court she regraded Ucham as a “friendly uncle”, who always looked out for her and her children since they lived in the same building. 

Regional Magistrate Mechluli Nyazo found that the two versions of the accused and complainant are mutually destructive, as they are on complete opposite ends. 

While some of the evidence corroborated one another, such as what happened in the car of the complainant and the bedroom of the accused, it also differs materially. 

While the accused maintains the sexual act was consensual and the complainant says it was non-consensual, the magistrate said he has no reason to reject the accused’s version. 

He further said he finds the version of the complainant about what happened in the car and her conduct after disembarking from the vehicle flies in the face of logic and makes her credibility questionable, and that it also makes it highly questionable as to whether any coercive circumstances existed while she was in the vehicle. 

“The court finds it highly improbable that after a person whom the complainant regarded as a ‘friendly uncle’ allegedly violated her by inserting his fingers in her privates and caressed and kissed her”, the complainant freely and voluntarily got out of her vehicle, freely and voluntarily walked with the accused to his house without raising any alarm, crying out for help or seeking refuge from a neighbour the compound.

The alleged sexual violation in the vehicle under normal circumstances ought to have traumatised her enough, such that she would fear the accused, which would make her conduct after disembarking from the vehicle that of a person acting out of free will, Nyazo stressed. 

The events in the accused’s house also do not dispel the version the complainant acted out of her free will at all times, the magistrate stated. 

According to him, the fact that she agreed to his request not to make noise, as his children were asleep, shows she was there out of her free will and was not forced by the accused. 

Nyazo said, in his view, the complainant did not tell the truth and was disingenuous; consequently, the charges against the accused are dismissed.

– rrouth@nepc.com.na