Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Momentum Group ‘Incorrectly’ Accused

Home Archived Momentum Group ‘Incorrectly’ Accused

By Catherine Sasman WINDHOEK Judgment was reserved to Friday in the High Court application for approval for the transfer of South African-based Momentum Group Limited’s long-term insurance business to Swabou Life Assurance Company Ltd. Judge Kato van Niekerk last Friday made the ruling after hearing arguments and counter-arguments for the transfer. In terms of the application, the Momentum Group expressed its intention to transfer its insurance business to Swabou Life in relation to Namibian policyholders underwritten by Momentum. In a founding affidavit, Swabou CEO Etienne Brits said the transfer would result in improved services to Namibian policyholders by Swabou’s extensive branch network in the country. Moreover, he said, the transfer would benefit policyholders for tax purposes. Namibian policyholders have been adversely affected since they were liable to pay tax in South Africa in respect of the investment reserve of their policies, which was in excess of the tax they would have had to pay if a Namibian insurer underwrote their policies. In the affidavit he also bemoaned “adverse media reports” which have “incorrectly” accused Momentum of “expatriating” funds from Namibia in an “underhanded manner”. Both Momentum and Swabou Life are insurers under the FirstRand group of companies. Acting on behalf of Momentum and Swabou, advocate Ben Swart from South Africa, assisted by advocate Essie Schimming-Chase, argued that the application was only for the transfer of the long-term insurance business of the Momentum Group. This, he said, was contrary to opposition by Hendrik Christian of Hope Financial Services, in that the transfer allegedly also involves the Self-Financed Retirement Annuity Fund (SRAF). He said fund policies issued to SRAF have since May 6, 2005 already been repatriated to SRAF in Namibia with the approval of the South African Registrar of Pension Funds, although still underwritten by Momentum. Christian is disputing this matter, saying that despite claims of repatriation of the SRAF, these pension funds are in fact still in the possession of the Momentum Group. Swart said three actuaries scrutinized the transfer – one appointed by Namfisa – and the two registrars of long- and short-term insurances. Both the High Court in South Africa and Namfisa have given their approval for the transfer. He said Christian’s objections to the transfer were based on “scurrilous” allegations “unsupported by any evidence”. Addressing the court in the Nama language with the assistance of an interpreter, Christian, who is engaged in a long drawn-out legal battle over the transfer of the Self-Financed Retirement Annuity Fund, said the same subject matter is in dispute with the Supreme Court, arguing therefore that the High Court does not have the necessary jurisdiction to grant approval of the transfer. The gravity of the matter, said Christian, is an attack on the sovereignty of Namibia, an “undermining of the economy” and “an attack on the legal institutions” of Namibia. After the adjournment of the court hearing, Erica Beukes of the Workers’ Advice Centre, snarled at the Momentum/Swabou legal team with a “Viva South Africa, Viva!” shout. “You are still deciding for us in crucial matters relating to our money; everybody decides what ought to happen with the money except Namibians.” She also described Namfisa as a “puppet that does not have the capacity to protect Namibian interests”, saying that the regulator should be investigated.