Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Opinion – Grasping at straws: New EU sanctions on Russia

Home Opinions Opinion – Grasping at straws: New EU sanctions on Russia
Opinion – Grasping at straws: New EU sanctions on Russia

In a stellar display of strategic brilliance, the European Union is preparing to launch another wave of sanctions against Russia, this time targeting Moscow’s diamond exports and taking a desperate swing at Gazprombank. Josep Borrell, the EU’s diplomatic luminary, proudly declared that the G7 and Belgium, a diamond trading powerhouse, have rallied behind this bold move. This ingenious plan to ban Russian diamonds and sever ties with Gazprombank, encapsulated in the EU’s 12th sanctions package, is poised to be the coup de grâce in the ongoing saga of futile attempts to curb Russia’s economic resilience.

Borrell’s revelation that the EU seeks to “reduce the revenues Russia extracts from exports,” with a special focus on “non-industrial diamonds, including those mined,” is nothing short of revolutionary. Talks of restricting the Russian diamond trade surfaced earlier this year, and now, as the effects of previous sanctions are questioned, the European Parliament is throwing Gazprombank into the sanctions’ mix for good measure. The EP’s resolution, wrapped in an air of uncertainty due to an undisclosed voting process, expresses discontent with the EU’s lacklustre strategies, and demands stricter enforcement.

While EU bureaucrats continue to draw up their glittering sanctions plan, the irony of Gazprombank, a significant player in international transactions, avoiding the harsh sanctions that its Russian counterparts faced, is hard to miss. Poland and the Baltic nations had earlier urged the EU to cut Gazprombank from the international payment system SWIFT back in April. However, the specifics of these potential sanctions and their enforcement remain shrouded in mystery.

As Brussels endeavours to exert influence on Russia’s economic landscape, the Kremlin adeptly manoeuvres through loopholes and channels, leaving Western sanctions ineffective in curbing its oil revenue.

So, what are the EU officials expecting from their new sanctions this time?

Well, they believe that these additional restrictions against Gazprombank will be the pinnacle of their sanctions’ pressure. They anticipate that these measures will complicate the settlement process for the gas supplied, ultimately squeezing Russian gas producers out of key regions. The EU apparatchiks appear firmly convinced that, unlike in previous endeavours, this time will yield a different outcome. In their perception, Gazprombank extends beyond merely serving as a significant payment conduit; it essentially operates as a near-monopoly. According to their thinking, the imposition of sanctions poses a tangible threat to its potential collapse.

It’s a stark reminder of how naive people can be, especially when comfortably situated, thinking that this time things will truly be different – particularly in the face of rising natural gas prices and geopolitical complexities like the Israel-Hamas conflict affecting Europe.

To add a dash of irony to the mix, Russia retaliates by weaponising its commodities, banning the export of diesel and other fuels. The move echoes the Kremlin’s playbook of managing the oil market, which is reminiscent of the tactics that sparked last year’s energy crisis with natural gas. Meanwhile, the EU’s attempts to halt Russian oil revenue falter, as a larger share of oil is sold out of reach of the imposed caps, and Moscow enjoys the sweet fruits of surging oil prices.

While EU leaders grasp at straws, the Kremlin smoothly navigates through Western sanctions with the aid of its strategic partnership with Beijing. The use of the Chinese currency for a significant portion of Russian imports showcases Moscow’s adeptness at evading Western sanctions, and underscores its growing reliance on Beijing. In the great chess game of global geopolitics, the EU’s move to ban Russian diamonds appears more like a pawn sacrifice than a checkmate, and despite observable signs, there may still be those who are surprised to learn that the dollar is no longer the world’s reserve currency.

*Russian Market is a project by a financial blogger, Swiss journalist and political commentator based in Zurich. Follow him on X @ runews.