Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

State appeals Noa’s rape acquittal

State appeals Noa’s rape acquittal

Prosecutor General Martha Imalwa has filed an application for leave to appeal the acquittal on appeal, of student doctor and rape accused Dennis Iipumbu Noa (30).

The application was filed in the High Court last week by State Advocate Palmer Khumalo against the verdict of not guilty given by High Court judges Herman January and Philanda Christiaans on 8 November last year. 

Noa was at first found guilty of rape in the Katutura Magistrate’s Court by regional magistrate Victor Nyazo. He appealed against that conviction, and was found not guilty by Judges January and Christiaans.

 The State wants to be allowed to appeal that acquittal in the Supreme Court. They claim the judges disregarded or paid insufficient regard to the totality of the circumstantial evidence which proved the guilt of Noa beyond reasonable doubt. 

According to the State, the finding by the judges that although one may infer that a sexual act was committed, considering the injuries to the genital area, the only reasonable inference cannot be that it was committed through rape, was faulty.

Further, the State submits, the judges disregarded the fact that once a sexual act was inferred, it could only have been committed in coercive circumstances, regard had to be taken to the condition of the victim. 

Noa was accused of sexually violating a comatose 18-year-old male patient on 11 April 2021.

The State also questions the judges’ finding that it was possible a fifth porter existed, despite evidence pointing to the contrary. The State also says the finding by the court that Noa’s version was reasonably possibly true while it was not supported by evidence, but merely on his say-so which was controverted by evidence led by the State, was wrong. 

In fact, the State says, evidence was led that the occupational therapy department did not operate on weekends, there was no reason for the accused to take the patient to the boardroom, there was no fifth porter on duty, and the accused failed to identify the porter in question, and in fact wrongly identified the uniform of security guards as that of porters.   

Noa’s defence team, led by Janike McLeod-Janser from Shikongo Law Chambers, indicated that they will oppose the leave to appeal application, and said the High Court was correct in finding that there was no evidence to convict their client. 

Noa was represented by Sisa Namandje during his appeal in the High Court.

-rrouth@nepc.com.na