Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Inherited water debt suit dismissed

Home National Inherited water debt suit dismissed
Inherited water debt suit dismissed

A Windhoek resident who inherited a home with a water debt of N$74 000 lost his bid to have the court force the City of Windhoek to write-off his debt and that of other residents.

Elifas Khoeseb sued the City of Windhoek claiming it was unjust when it took the decision to cut off water supply to his family home in Dolam due to outstanding payment.

Khoeseb claims the debt of N$74 000 incurred on his late mother’s home was a result of previous illegal occupants. He said he had no idea that his mother owned the home. Thus, as the new owner, he does not wish to pay for a debt he or his mother did not incur. 

He further claims the City was wrong to cut off the water supply during the Covid-19 pandemic as it goes against the pandemic’s regulations. The water was disconnected on 21 April 2021.

In his bid, he requested the court to order a write-off of his inherited debt and that of other residents who have debts dating far back as five to 10 years.

However, on Friday, Windhoek High Court Judge Claudia Claasen dismissed his application, saying the City is empowered to disconnect the water supply to its residents who fail to pay. She said this is provided for in the City’s credit control and debt collection policy. Thus, the municipality did not act illegally in cutting off the water supply.

She said in this case, the arrears were not paid and the cut off follows non payment. “I regard it as a day-to-day enforcement of the applicable policy measures for the efficient recovery of the debt and sustainability of the water supply,” said Claasen. 

She said the decision by the municipality does not amount to an administrative action despite having been carried out by a local authority. So, it was contractual in nature and does not amount to an administrative action.  Claasen further said Khoeseb failed to make out a case for the orders he sought.

-mamakali@nepc.com.na