Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

EPA conclusion – no time for complacency: IPPR

Home Business EPA conclusion – no time for complacency: IPPR

WINDHOEK – The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) has warned in its latest Economy Watch Namibia publication, that although relief has been brought to affected industries, there is no time for complacency now that the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the European Union (EU) has been finalized.

Compiled by IPPR’s Research Associate, Klaus Schade, the publication notes that Namibia needs to diversify its product range and export markets and needs to become more competitive. 

“The benefit of preferential access to the EU will erode over time, since the EU is negotiating free trade agreements with other countries and regional groupings. It has just signed the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada and is negotiating a mega-trade deal with the USA – the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). The USA is involved in a second mega-trade agreement, namely the Trans Pacific Partnership (TTP) with countries around the Pacific.” 

Schade remarks that although Namibia (or other third parties) is not directly affected, these agreements will eventually have an affect since they ease access to these markets for other producers and have the potential to redirect trade and investment flows. “Moreover, these agreements are reportedly setting new standards for investor and other protection that will set the scene for investment agreements elsewhere,” stated Schade. 

Schade noted that the “so-called SADC EPA group” initialed the EPA just before the 1 October deadline set by the EU, making it the first regional grouping in Africa to have successfully finalized the EPA negotiations with the EU.

“This brought to an end ten years of protracted negotiations between a group of SADC countries that first consisted of the SACU member states, joined by Angola, Mozambique and Tanzania. Tanzania took a logical decision and joined the East African Community for the negotiations, while Angola opted out to trade with the EU market under the Everything-but-Arms (EBA) schemes that allows Least Developed Countries duty-free, quota-free access to the EU market for almost all products except arms. South Africa joined the negotiations although it has been trading with the EU under its bilateral and reciprocal Trade and Development Agreement (TDCA),” explained Schade. 

Negotiations for a new trade agreement were necessitated by the fact that the existing Contonou Agreement between the EU and most of its former colonies in the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) regions provided for non-reciprocal preferences, which were not in line with the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO’s) regulations.

The WTO granted a waiver until the end of 2007 for the continuation of the Contonou Agreement, which put pressure on the parties to agree on new terms.