Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Camera thief appeals successfully

Home Crime and Courts Camera thief appeals successfully

By Tunomukwathi Asino

WINDHOEK – Mbala Sihope on Monday succeeded in having his sentence halved, after he was sentenced for stealing a camera.
Sihope was sentenced to 36 months, of which 12 months were suspended for a period of three years, in the Katima Mulilo Magistrate’s Court on July 27 last year.

He appealed against his conviction with the High Court in Windhoek. Kadhila Amoomo of Sisa Namandje & Co law firm represented him.
He won the appeal and the judges changed the sentence to a fine of N$5 000 or in default of payment to spend 12 months in prison.
Sihope, through his lawyer, argued that the magistrate erred in that a sentence of 36 months imprisonment, of which 12 months is suspended “is in respect shockingly inappropriate and startlingly heavier given the circumstances of the case in particular”.

The lawyer further argued the camera was recovered and returned to its rightful owner and Sihope, on the other hand, had expressed remorse.

The lawyer further argued that the magistrate attached undue weight to the prevalence of the offence and to the deterrence of the offender and potential offenders at the expense of reformative sentencing considerations and other factors in favour of Sihope.

Amoomo further argued that Sihope pleaded guilty and did not waste the court’s time. “We humbly submit that the magistrate ought to have sufficiently taken this into account,” Amoomo informed the court.

“All accused persons have a constitutional right to plead not guilty. Sihope must indeed be commended for not opting to sit idle and/or deny the allegations from the onset and thereby saving the state’s resources,” the defence lawyer added.

Judges Nate Ndauendapo and Judge Christie Liebenberg heard the appeal.