Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Court dismisses admissibility of confession challenge

Home National Court dismisses admissibility of confession challenge
Court dismisses admissibility of confession challenge

The objection against the admissibility of a confession by David Tashiya, one of the men charged with the murder of Walvis Bay businessman Hans-Jorg Möller, was dismissed yesterday by Windhoek High Court Judge Dinnah Usiku.

Tashiya objected to the admissibility of the statement, saying it was not obtained freely, fairly and without undue influence. 

According to him, the confession was obtained under duress, as he was assaulted on several occasions until he felt he had no choice but to do as the police wanted. 

He told the court that during two occasions in June 2016, he was assaulted – and a plastic bag was put over his head for him to make a confession. 

He further said he was threatened not to divulge the assaults to anyone, and he was forcefully taken to Swakopmund Magistrate’s Court to make the confession. 

Both police officers accused by him vehemently denied they ever assaulted Tashiya and informed the court he was the one who initiated the meetings between them and wanted to confess. 

The magistrate who took down the confession also testified she observed no injuries or bruises on Tashiya, and that he told her he was not unduly influenced or threatened to make the confession. 

According to Judge Usiku, the accused was not truthful when he testified he was assaulted or threatened with assault. 

“In my view, accused [number] two had the opportunity to inform the magistrate in clear and unambiguous terms that he had been assaulted and had been threatened with further assaults if he declined to make a confession but did not do that,” the judge said.  

Tashiya, together with Panduleni Gotlieb, David Shekudja, Elly Ndapuka Hinaivali and Malakia Shiweda, is charged with murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to commit housebreaking with the intent to rob and robbery with aggravating circumstances.

They are also charged with housebreaking with the intent to rob and robbery with aggravating circumstances and two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition for allegedly breaking into the house of Möller during a daring robbery.

 The accused allegedly shot him when he came to the defence of his wife and children during the early morning hours of 17 June 2016.

They then ransacked the house in search of money and other valuables, where after they fled the scene with the stolen items, it is charged. 

Möller was then transported to a hospital, where he succumbed to injuries he sustained due to the gunshot.

According to the State, the five accused acted with a common purpose.

The matter will return to Court on 3 October for continuation of trial, and the accused remain in custody. – rrouth@nepc.com.na