New Era Newspaper

New Era Epaper
Icon Collap
...
Home / AG slaps Nkurenkuru with adverse opinion

AG slaps Nkurenkuru with adverse opinion

2024-01-24  Edward Mumbuu

AG slaps Nkurenkuru with adverse opinion

Auditor General (AG) Junias Kandjeke slapped the Nkurenkuru Town Council with an adverse audit opinion, as the financial statements do not give a fair reflection of its financial health and performance.

Kandjeke’s opinion is embedded in the town council’s AG report for the 2021/2022 financial year which was released late last year.

“In my opinion, because of the significance of matters discussed in the basis for the adverse audit opinion paragraph, the financial statements do not present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nkurenkuru town council as of 30 June 2022,” Kandjeke said in the report.

An adverse opinion indicates that a company’s financial statements are misrepresented, misstated, and do not accurately reflect its financial performance and health.

Kandjeke poked several holes in the council’s accounting processes.

For instance, he found a difference amounting to N$4.3 million between total assets amounting to N$108.2 million and the net assets and liabilities amounting to N$103.9 million for the comparative figure.

Furthermore, a difference amounting to N$22.3 million was observed between total assets amounting to N$126.2 million and the net assets and liabilities amounting to N$103.9 million for 2022. 

“It is recommended to the council to ensure that checks and balances are in place,” Kandjeke recommended.

On the front of its cash flow and investments, a difference of N$7 million was noted between the auditors’ recalculation of N$10.5 million and the balance disclosed in the cash flow statements of N$3.5 million.  

“The auditors also observed the disposal of assets in note 29. However, no cash flow movement was included as a result of this. It is recommended that the council should ensure that account balances are accurately disclosed, and differences are corrected on a timely basis,” Kandjeke said.

Financial woes

The more the audit report is analysed, the darker the picture becomes of Nkurenkuru’s financial position as a difference of N$2.1 million was also detected between an amount of N$50.1 million in its annual financial statements and N$48 million in the age analysis.

Kandjeke recommended that the council should ensure that variances are reconciled.

The council furthermore disclosed the total amount of N$3.51 million for the Build Together programme as a noncurrent trade and other receivable.

But it failed to provide the amortisation schedule for the auditor to assess the current and or non-current portion of the loan.

“It is recommended that the council should ensure that all supporting documents are provided for audit purposes in terms of the State Finance Act and account balances are properly classified,” Kandjeke advised once more.

Meanwhile, liabilities amounting to N$1.7 million were processed upon payment on 11 August 2022 and not accrued within the current financial year. “It is recommended that the council perform monthly creditor reconciliations, in order to ensure that the outstanding reconciling items are accounted for on a timely basis,” he pleaded.

More so, the council did not disclose its accounting policy related to the subsequent measurement of intangible Assets as required by IPSAS 31. “It is recommended that the council updates its accounting policy to ensure that intangible assets are fairly stated in the annual financial statements.”

As for the retirement or disposal of assets, one of the youngest town councils in the land failed to provide supporting documents, apart from the journals, for items written off due to damage amounting to N$ 1.6 million.

“Furthermore, the council did not assess its assets for impairment in accordance with IPSAS l. It is recommended that the Council ensure that all supporting documents are provided for audit purposes in terms of the State Finance Act 1991,” he further found.

Kandjeke added: “A difference of N$1.3 million is observed between the WIP transferred to infrastructure amounting to N$ 7.3 million and addition to infrastructure amounting to N$ 8.5 million. It is recommended that the council should ensure that reconciliation is regularly performed, and variances are confirmed and rectified.”

- emumbuu@nepc.com.na


2024-01-24  Edward Mumbuu

Share on social media