Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

‘jealousy Breeds BEE Failure’

Home Archived ‘jealousy Breeds BEE Failure’

By Petronella Sibeene WINDHOEK Envy and jealousy among Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) players is partially to blame for the failure of the initiative that strives to bring economic emancipation to previously disadvantaged Namibians. This was said by the Chairperson of the Namibia Chamber of Commerce and Industry (NCCI) Standing Committee on BEE, Titus Haim-bili yesterday. At a seminar on Project and BEE Financing attended by business representatives from financing institutions, Haim-bili stated that apart from insufficient funding, tight security demands by funding institutions and lack of comprehensive legislation to facilitate the BEE process, the culture of envy and jealousy is spreading in the country. “Emerging and successful black entrepreneurs are always subjected to bad-mouthing and abuse,” he noted. The continuous failure of BEE projects, Haimbili says, has also been exacerbated by in-fighting among the empowered black entrepreneurs resulting in the financier becoming the referee, thereby exploiting the situation in order to create discord and remain in control. Since the BEE initiative came into being, many myths still surround the concept. According to Haimbili, there is a general perception that BEE must only take place where Government tenders are involved. He noted there is a special breed of people from previously disadvantaged Nami-bians who are entitled and qualify for BEE financing. The absence of an institution to monitor and manage this process and programmes has also played a role in the ineffectiveness of BEE projects. Currently, most empowerment efforts, Haimbili added, appear to be ineffective palliatives and do not necessarily demonstrate the kind of understanding required to bring about transformation or change. He said, “We need to change into another gear which can fast-track and propel BEE efforts by coming up with a definition on BEE, which is not narrow enough to allow pessimists to see it as a transaction focusing at transfer of equity and ownership only.” Though Haimbili did not elaborate, he suggested that the definition should be broad enough to incorporate vital elements of an integrated society. Insufficient finance and lack of access to BEE projects has always been one of the challenges faced by many previously disadvantaged people in Namibia. The financing houses and institutions, Haimbili stressed, should relax their interest rates and security demands in order to accommodate BEE companies and if possible introduce a grace period before repayment of loans. The Chief Executive Officer of the Government Institutions Pension Fund (GIPF) Primus Hango in support of Haimbili indicated that projects fail because the theoretical analysis is biased and figures are tweaked so that the company can assume a profitable status. This in return poses a challenge to financiers who have to ensure that the figures provided are genuine. “The failure of projects is usually ascribed to the fact that co-ordinators have not been able to fully implement the strategies as indicated in the business plans, hence this leads to the collapse of the projects.” Generally, business acumen is lacking and this failure of BEE reflects the people in the industry, he added. Haimbili warned that if the process is not properly handled it has the potential to turn into a breeding ground for corruption, nepotism and social tensions.