Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Judgment reserved in N$450 million Rössing appeal

Home National Judgment reserved in N$450 million Rössing appeal

Roland Routh

Windhoek-Three judges of the Supreme Court reserved their judgment late last week on an appeal that Rössing Uranium Mine and the trustees of the Rössing Pension Fund lodged against a decision by the Windhoek High Court to nullify a decision of the mine regarding the distribution of some N$454 million surplus from the Fund.

High Court Judge Shafimana Uitele ruled in favour of the former members of the Fund when the members, represented by Cape Town-based Advocate Norman Arendse, instructed by Clement Daniels Attorneys, and assisted by Advocate Werner Boesak, dragged the Fund and Rössing to court after a decision was made to give them only 15% of the surplus, while the mine was to get 33% and current members of the Fund 52%.

The disgruntled former members first approached the court in September 2012 to review and set aside the decision, but decided to abandon their first application after being advised it was defective, only to re-launched it in August 2014.

They claimed that the trustees of the Fund had rubber-stamped the allocation suggested by the mine management, which did not have the necessary powers to make the decision.
Judge Uitele said the crux of the matter was whether the trustees used their powers, or had simply followed the dictates of the mine.

In their appeal to the Supreme Court the mine and the Fund argued that Judge Uitele did not deal with the issues of undue delay and the non-joinder of the active members of the Fund, including current members and pensioners, as well as former members. The mine and the Fund want the Supreme Court to dismiss the ruling of Judge Uitele and to order the former members to pay the costs of the application on a scale of instructing and instructed counsels for both.

Chief Justice Peter Shivute, Deputy Chief Justice and Judge President Petrus Damaseb and Acting Supreme Court Justice Dave Smuts reserved judgment in the long-running saga for a later date.