Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Oranjemund gets adverse audit opinion

Home National Oranjemund gets adverse audit opinion
Oranjemund gets adverse audit opinion

KEETMANSHOOP – There is no accountability at the Oranjemund Town Council. This is after auditor general (AG) Junias Kandjeke gave the southern local authority an adverse audit opinion, the worst opinion there is. Kandjeke’s opinion covers the 2020/21 financial year (FY).

In accounting, an adverse opinion is given when an entity’s financial statements are misrepresented, misstated and do not accurately reflect its financial performance and health. “The financial statements do not present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position of the Oranjemund Town Council and its financial performance and cash flows,” Kandjeke says in an audit report that was tabled in the National Assembly for scrutiny last week. He continued that the financial statements audited comprise Oranjemund’s financial positions, comprehensive income, changes in equity, cash flows and notes to the annual financial statements.

Chief among his findings was that his auditors were unable to verify account receivables of N$14.21 million in 2020 and N$18.45 million in 2021. “This was due to council failing to provide the customer detailed ledger for audit purposes and does furthermore not agree to financial statements,’’ said Kandjeke. The AG cont inued: “It is recommended that council provides customers detailed ledgers for audit purposes”.

On the property front, plant and equipment, a difference of N$10.36 million was observed between the financial statement opening balance of N$59 million in 2020 and the reconciliation of property, plant and equipment closing balance of N$48 million in 2019. “It is recommended that council ensures property, plant and equipment reconciliation are reconciling to financial statements,” Kandjeke further recommended. More so, inventories amounting to N$2.1 million in 2020 could also not be confirmed, as the inventory report was not provided for audit purposes, neither were external auditors invited by council to do stocktaking, the AGnoted. In terms of audits of key performance indicators, it was found that the local authority had approved annual strategic

plans in place, but it could, however, not be established if these plans have been reviewed accordingly, making it difficult if the pre-determined targets were met