Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Damning evidence surfaces in Valombola’s murder trial

Home Front Page News Damning evidence surfaces in Valombola’s murder trial

A report, confirming that the bullets that killed a 25-year-old student leader Helao Ndjaba were “most likely” fired from the firearm of Commissioner of Refugees Likius Valombola, surfaced yesterday in his murder trial currently underway in the Windhoek High Court. 
The report, authored by ballistics scientist Kallipus Sem of the National Forensic Science Institute of Namibia, only came to light when the presiding judge Claudia Claasen asked additional questions after the State and defence concluded their questioning. 

The judge wanted to know from Sem whether the bullets found in the brain of the victim could not be matched to Valombola’s pistol. However, Sem was quick to inform the judge that he had compiled a second report on ballistics tests. 

According to him, he test-fired three live rounds from Valombola’s pistol and compared them to the projectile recovered from the victim’s brain. He said the grooves on the test rounds and the projectile matched and that he concluded the pistol of Valombola could not be excluded as the firearm that fired the shots.  Sisa Namandje, who is representing Valombola, immediately objected to the report being introduced as evidence, saying if the witness had known previously about the report, he would have devised his defence strategy accordingly. 

According to him, he already, during the pre-trial stages of the matter, asked the State to discover all evidence against his client. The State, represented by Ethel Ndlovu, however, informed the court that she too was caught by surprise by the report, as she was unaware of its existence. Judge Claasen, however, ruled the report should be introduced, as the court is entitled to have all evidence in front of it to make an informed decision – one way or the other.  Namandje accused the scientist as he did when he questioned the police of doing a half-baked job. Valombola is on trial over the shooting of Ndjaba, a former student leader, who died after nine days in the Katutura state hospital, following a shooting incident in Katutura on 18 May 2018. 

Valombola had admitted he fired the shots but denied intending to kill anyone. According to Valombola, he was on his way home with his wife and son when they came across a stationary vehicle. Valombola claimed in his plea explanation that he fired two warning shots in quick succession to ward off an attack after some people became unruly and threatening when asked to move their car by his son.
Namandje argued that his client’s version is that he did not fire in the direction of anyone. If he fired the fatal shot, it was accidental, Namandje said.  
Eyewitness reports of the incident at the time said Ndjaba was an innocent bystander who was waiting for a taxi when he was shot. The trial continues. 
– rrouth@nepc.com.na