Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Debating the budget is a waste of time – UPM

Home Politics Debating the budget is a waste of time – UPM

Kuzeeko Tjitemisa
Windhoek

United People’s Movement (UPM) parliamentarian Jan van Wyk says debating the national budget is a “waste of time” as the inputs will not have an influence on the budget as tabled.

Contributing to the budget debate in the National Assembly last week, Van Wyk, who is also the party’s national chairperson, said requests for MPs to be part of the budget process had been ignored to a certain extent, yet it is expected of them, especially the opposition, to approve the budget without pointing out shortcomings.

But Van Wyk said provision was indeed made to increase old-age pensions, which he appreciates. However, he said, there is an urgent need to revisit the amounts paid out for social grants.

“These amounts have remained the same for some years now,” said the MP. Touching on the National Equitable Economic Empowerment Framework (NEEEF) Bill, Van Wyk said the framework as an instrument to promote economic empowerment would have a negative effect on direct investments. Van Wyk further said the resettlement programme has failed the masses, as it continues to benefit the selected elite.

“It is clear that the government is adamant to put through efforts to allocate land to the elite before the second land conference,” he said.

The mass housing programme has also failed, he said. “Research has highlighted poor communication between stakeholders as an explanation for the mismatch between the demand for and supply of housing.”

“Across the country houses built under the mass housing programme stand vandalised and without occupants. Houses meant for low-income groups have become inaccessible to them, but easy to get by middle-income earners instead. Housing is a human right and in order to have a house you first need to have land,” he added.

According to him, most local authorities use land prices and the costs to service land as an excuse to avail land to developers at the cost of the poor and low-income groups.

“Land prices have been inflicted by those who can afford it, and nothing has been done to attend to the problem at hand,” he said.

Van Wyk says across the country huge portions of urban land are being made available at high cost to generate income for local authorities to cover their running expenses, instead of using the funds generated for the servicing of land.

•••• Caption
UPM’s Jan van Wyk