Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Government withdraws suit against hostel food tender cancellation

Home National Government withdraws suit against hostel food tender cancellation

The education ministry has notified the Windhoek High Court of its decision not to continue with the suit it had filed against the review panel’s decision to suspend the contracts awarded to four food supply companies and have the tendering process start afresh.

On Tuesday, the ministry indicated that they have reached a settlement in the matter, and no longer wish to pursue the second portion of their review application after the High Court ruled in their favour in an urgent interdict in September last year.

In September 2022, Judge Boas Usiku ruled in favour of the education ministry by granting the interdict it sought against the review panel’s decision to suspend the food tender awarded to Tsepo Catering, Kunene Caterers, Atlantic Catering Solutions and Eyambeko Namibia Catering Services in July of that year due to proper procedures not having been followed.

The court at the time indicated that the interim interdict would commence with immediate effect, and will remain in force until the review application before the court is finalised – which left the second part unresolved.

In the second part of the ministry’s application, it sought a review of the review panel’s decision in its entirety to be set aside and declared invalid and of no force.

The review panel made the order on 26 July 2022, following a review application on 13 July 2022 by Heritage Caterers, one of the companies which lost out on the tender.

The ministry said as a matter of urgency due to the school hostels having been scheduled to open on 17 July 2022, the finance ministry granted an exemption to the education ministry so that it could procure food for school hostels without going through the normal tendering process. 

This meant the ministry would not have been complying with certain provisions of the Procurement Act.

On 6 July 2022, the bid evaluation committee (BEC) evaluated bids from eight prospective companies. A bid evaluation report was then submitted to the procurement committee. 

On 8 July 2022, Tsepo Catering, Kunene Caterers, Atlantic Catering Solutions and Eyambeko Namibia Catering Services emerged as successful bidders to supply food from July to December.

A notice was given on 11 July 2022 to the unsuccessful bidders, being Free Namibia Caterers, Atlantic Food Services and Heritage Caterers.

According to the ministry, the review panel’s decision came at a time when the government had already bought the food from the suppliers. 

Heritage said it was within the seven-day timeframe, as required by law, when it submitted its
review application to the review panel.

The catering company sought a review because they had the lowest quotation, which could have saved the government nearly N$10 million. In addition, the ministry unlawfully used benchmark prices and the 5% margin preference – which was unknown to bidders.

– mamakali@nepc.com.na