Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Gustavo Supreme Court bail appeal date set

Home National Gustavo Supreme Court bail appeal date set
Gustavo Supreme Court bail appeal date set

The Supreme Court has set the date for Prosecutor General Martha Imalwa’s appeal against the release of Fishrot accused Ricardo Gustavo on bail.

Chief Justice Peter Shivute decided on 14 November after the State petitioned him for an expeditated hearing.

Windhoek High Court judge Herman Oosthuizen released Gustavo on an N$800 000 bond with stringent conditions and dismissed an application by the PG to appeal the ruling in the Supreme Court.

In his ruling on the appeal application, Judge Oosthuizen said the discretion to impose bail conditions to provide freedom to the accused as well as for the interest of justice or the interest of the administration of justice remains with the court. 

He said the bail conditions were specifically designed to address the interests and concerns of both the accused and the State while preserving the interest of justice or the interest of the administration of justice. 

Therefore, he said, he concluded that there are no reasonable prospects that the Supreme Court will come to another conclusion or that the Supreme Court will come to a conclusion that he exercised his discretion wrongly in any circumstances.

Advocate Ed Marondedze, who is conducting the appeal on behalf of the PG, said Oosthuizen failed to consider and make an appropriate ruling on whether or not the grounds that were tendered by Gustavo constituted new grounds that warranted him to consider the bail status of Gustavo. 

“Had he done so, he would have realised that the alleged new facts did not change the basis on which bail was previously denied in the magistrate’s court and subsequently by the High Court, namely … ‘the alleged amount involved is significantly high and all the offences the applicant faces are serious in nature’ and that consequently, it will not be in the interest of the public or administration of justice to release the applicant on bail.” 

Narrowing what public interest a court should consider in a bail application as per his judgment led the judge to a wrong conclusion. 

“In doing so, he failed to consider and appreciate that the concept of public interest or the administration of justice is broader and needs to be given a comprehensive interpretation and it was therefore required of the judge to bring himself to consider and apply the following considerations to the circumstances of the case in that the respondent (Gustavo) was facing serious charges; he had no answers to documentary evidence tendered by the State; he will be convicted of the charges and that he had no defence against some of the charges and that the State case against him is arguably strong and therefore there is prima facie evidence that he had committed the crimes preferred against him,” Marondedze argued.

Although Gustavo was granted bail, his co-accused former justice minister Sacky Shanghala, former chairman of Fishcor James Hatuikulipi, former CEO of Fishcor Mike Nghipunya, Pius Mwatelulo, Otneel Shuudifonya and Phillipus Mwapopi were denied bail by Windhoek High Court judge Shafimana Uietele. Tamson Hatuikulipi has a pending bail application. 

The group, alongside former fisheries minister Bernhard Esau and fugitive lawyer Marèn de Klerk, is charged for corruptly receiving payments of at least N$103.6 million to allow Icelandic fishing company Samherji secure access to horse mackerel quotas in Namibia. 

The group, alongside 11 corporate entities and trusts connected to them, are charged with counts of racketeering, fraud, money laundering and other alleged crimes in connection to alleged fishing quota allocations and bribery. 

They further face charges ranging from racketeering to fraud and money laundering for allegedly channelling millions of dollars from Fishcor to their bank accounts.

– rrouth@nepc.com.na