Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Infanticide accused asks for lesser charge

Home National Infanticide accused asks for lesser charge
Infanticide accused asks for lesser charge

Roland Routh

Milton Engelbrecht, the legal aid-instructed lawyer of a woman accused of murdering her six-month-old son by hitting his head on the ground, last week asked the court to find her not guilty of murder but of culpable homicide instead.

Priscilla Daukeline Stuurman (30) pleaded not guilty to a charge of murder, read with the provisions of the Combating of Domestic Violence Act, before Windhoek High Court Judge Claudia Claasen at the start of her trial.

Engelbrecht argued the State failed to prove Stuurman had the intention to kill her son. 

According to him, her version that the infant fell out of her hands because of her drunkenness could be reasonably possibly true. 

He said witness testimony that his client habitually mistreated the child when she was drunk does not per se constitute evidence supporting the murder charge. 

He said, while her version of what transpired on that fateful evening might be suspected in some respect, it can not be rejected outright as false beyond a reasonable doubt. 

He said the court must be guided by established rules and principles of law. “What is required is for the court to be convinced that her version is not only improbable but false beyond a reasonable doubt,” he said and continued: The test remains whether there is a reasonable possibility that the accused’s evidence may be true – and in applying that test, the court needs not even believe her story. 

It is sufficient, he said, if the court is satisfied there is a reasonable possibility that it may be substantially true. 

He argued if the court finds that the accused is responsible for the death of the victim, then the court must find that it was not intentional and convict her of culpable homicide.

For his part, State advocate Taodago Gaweseb argued that although the evidence before court is circumstantial, as there were no eyewitnesses to the incident, the evidence presented is credible – and the only inference to be drawn is that the accused is guilty.

Stuurman is accused of intentionally killing Stiaan Cidio Stuurman by hitting his head on the ground, causing his skull to fracture and leading to his death one day later. 

Judge Claasen reserved her judgment until 11 August. 

Stuurman is on bail, but she is in custody in Keetmanshoop for a different matter.