Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Judges: Magistrates should keep their cool in court

Home National Judges: Magistrates should keep their cool in court
Judges: Magistrates should keep their cool in court

Two judges of the Windhoek High Court have castigated sitting magistrates who lose their cool while courts are in session. 

Windhoek High Court Judge Naomi Shivute in concurrence with Judge Herman January said this during a review of a case where a magistrate in Walvis Bay sentenced an accused to three months in jail for contempt of court.

The accused, Nathan de Bruyne, was arraigned on a charge of robbery and indicated to the court that he would plead not guilty to the charge when asked. 

He told the court that the phone he was accused of robbing belonged to him and he merely repossessed it. 

However, when the matter was postponed, and he was remanded in custody pending a formal bail application, De Bruyne became unruly and used extremely vulgar language towards the magistrate. 

Despite several warnings by the magistrate to desist from such behaviour, he continued swearing and shouting, interrupting court proceedings. Exasperated, the magistrate then sentenced him to three months in jail for contempt without holding a hearing or explaining his rights to mitigation or allowing him to mitigate. 

“It is undoubtedly clear that what the accused said towards the magistrate was contemptuous and uncalled for,” the judge stated.

 The court went on to say: “Unfortunately, it appears that the magistrate let her emotions get the better of her and overlooked to pronounce the accused guilty. Instead, she proceeded to sentence him to three months imprisonment without explaining to him his right to mitigation or affording him a chance to mitigate before sentencing”. 

Judge Shivute, who wrote the judgment, further said that judicial officers should endeavour to rise above emotions and maintain their cool-headedness throughout the trial, even amidst the most extreme provocation. She continued to say that the glaring omissions by the magistrate amount to serious irregularities that cannot be overlooked and consequently the proceedings in this matter cannot be said to be in accordance with justice.

 As such, the judge said, the sentence is set aside as there was no conviction in the first place.

– rrouth@nepc.com.na