Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Lawyer succeeds with self-defence claim

Home National Lawyer succeeds with self-defence claim
Lawyer succeeds with self-defence claim

Windhoek-based lawyer Jermaine Muchali successfully defended a man who was accused of stabbing another man to death during a fight at a bar.

Pendapala Paulus was acquitted on a charge of murder, after he pleaded self-defence on a murder charge by magistrate Johannes Shuuveni in the Windhoek Regional Court.

Muchali argued that the State miserably failed to prove its case against his client beyond a reasonable doubt as required by law.

Paulus stabbed Jesaya Katana on 27 December 2017 seven times in the back. 

He died because of one stab wound in the back, which penetrated the chest. 

Paulus claimed that he stabbed the deceased in self-defence while the victim was on top of him and sat on his stomach. 

According to him, the deceased was a trained soldier and he was afraid for his life when he overpowered him.

Muchali argued the version of Paulus cannot be rejected as false beyond reasonable doubt as he and the deceased were alone at the time of the incident. 

Therefore, he said, the inference to be drawn from the stated facts should favour the accused in that he did not exceed the bounds of self-defence when he defended himself from an attack by the deceased.

Magistrate Shuuveni agreed with Muchali that there is no direct evidence. 

He said it is only the evidence of the accused, which was corroborated by State witnesses. In fact, he said, evidence was led that the deceased was the aggressor and the defence raised by the accused is unassailable and must succeed if put through an objective test.

In the end, he said, it automatically follows that the court is not satisfied that the State proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused must be acquitted.