Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Witbooi chieftaincy hangs in balance

Home National Witbooi chieftaincy hangs in balance
Witbooi chieftaincy hangs in balance

The High Court has been asked to decide if the designation of Hendrik Ismael Witbooi as chief of the Witbooi Traditional Authority by government was legal.

This comes after the parties argued the matter in court this week, following an application by former Namibian High Commissioner to Zambia Salomon Josephat Witbooi challenging government’s decision to designate his cousin Ismael as Kaptein of the Witbooi community.

Then minister of urban and rural development Peya Mushelenga had designated Ismael as leader of the Witbooi community on 22 May 2019 and subsequently gazetted by order of the President on 15 August 2019. 

Salomon, who is claiming to be the rightful leader of the Witbooi community, wants the court to review and set aside government’s decision. 

In his application, Salomon is supported by fellow royal house members Anna Jacobs, who is his mother, Elizabeth Kock and Christina Fredricks, and the spokesperson of the Witbooi royal family, Penias Topnaar. Salomon and Ismael are cousins, and are both nephews of the late Kaptein Hendrik Witbooi, who was at the helm of the Witbooi community from 1978 until his death in 2009. 

The community fell under the leadership of Christian Rooi who was acting until his death in 2015. 

Salomon claims he was elected as Rooi’s successor during his reign by Kock, Fredricks and Jacobs who are authorised to do so by the Witbooi royal house.

His nomination was allegedly endorsed by the Witbooi Traditional Council. 

Subsequently, an application for designation was forwarded to the governor’s office, which was later forwarded to the minister. 

But the minister on 22 May 2019, decided to approve the application of Ismael and officially recognising him as chief.

Salomon’s lawyer Reinhard Tötemeyer argued the minister’s decision was not in accordance with customary laws and as such, the designation is invalid. 

Tötemeyer said the right to apply for designation lies only with the Witbooi royal house and such authority was never granted to anyone. 

“It is not without significance that the Witbooi royal house and its elders – who have the authority to designate a chief, did not attend the coronation ceremony of the third respondent (Ismael), given the fact that the custodian of the designation ceremony, according to the Witbooi clan is the Witbooi royal house,” explained Tötemeyer.  

Tötemeyer added the application was not authorised and subsequent approval of such unauthorised application constitutes nullity. 

 

According to Ismael, he has always been the rightful designated leader of the community but the dispute over his chieftaincy started when Hendrik died in 2009, despite his designation being in accordance with the Witbooi traditional community customary practices.

His lawyer Sylvia Kahengombe, argued Ismael was placed under pressure to renounce his membership and position in the new African Methodist Episcopal church. 

His refusal allegedly caused division in the royal family with each faction nominating its own candidate.

“What the court should keep in its mind in this regard is that the royal family had two factions. However, as stated above in terms of the customary law of the Witbooi community, succession is based on the patrilineal line and for that reason, the third respondent (Ismael) was nominated to be a successor to the late Kaptein Witbooi,” argued Kahengombe.

Kahengombe further said Ismael’s coronation was in accordance with the recognised and valid law of Namibia in that his nomination as chief was made by the elders of the royal family as per custom and his application for approval of his designation was made by a councillor of the traditional council of the Witbooi Traditional Authority as required by the Act. 

In an affidavit, Mushelenga defended his position, saying the application for recognition as chief was supported by the Witbooi Traditional Authority, which is the designated traditional authority for the Witbooi community.

He said he considered both applications as well as a report from a committee that investigated the competing applications, and argued that the proper processes in terms of the Traditional Authorities Act were followed before he designated Ismael as the new kaptein.

He denied allegations of having favoured Ismael.

Judge Thomas Masuku will give a ruling in the matter on 5 April 2022. 

-mamakali@nepc.com.na

Chieftaincy battle… Hendrik Ismael Witbooi with Vice President Nangolo Mbumba.

Photo: Nampa