Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Unam Lecturers: A Legal Conundrum

Home Archived Unam Lecturers: A Legal Conundrum

By Catherine Sasman

WINDHOEK

Although the University of Namibia should ‘discipline’ its lecturers for holding political office, the institution would have a difficult time to defend its disciplinary action against Usutuaije Maamberua and Dr Tangeni Iijambo.

This is the opinion of the Director of the Legal Assistance Centre (LAC), Norman Tjombe, arguing that while academic staff at a tertiary institution should be seen as ‘independent’ and unfettered by political ideologies, the institution could be seen as being selective in the execution of its regulations.

Tjombe cited Eunice Iipinge, who has continued working at the university despite being a prominent member of the Swapo Party.

Public Relations Officer of Unam, Uutara Hoveka, however, said although Iipinge remained in the employment of the university, she took unpaid leave while she was secretary general of her party, also citing the example of the late Kala Gertze, who resigned from his position as lecturer once elected as the secretary general of the Congress of Democrats (CoD).

Disciplinary committee member, Prof Nico Horn, stressed that the action taken against the two lecturers should not be viewed as a witch-hunt, but merely as effecting the regulations of Unam.

The disciplinary action planned against the two lecturers – holding the positions of president and secretary general in Swanu – is, according to Hoveka, in accordance with internal regulations of the institution, and not necessarily in accordance with the Unam Act, a legislative provision sanctioned by Parliament.

This, said labour and legal expert, Clement Daniels, could make it difficult to defend, should the case be brought before the High Court.

Daniels said the Namibian Constitution does make provision for rights and freedom of association that can be limited by an Act of Parliament, but that internal regulations should be viewed subject to the Constitution.

He is of the opinion that as long as political activities of lecturers or other university staff do not interfere with their work – “if they do not take it to the classroom” – such staff should not be restricted from exercising their rights of freedom of expression and political activism.

Vice Rector of the Polytechnic of Namibia, Dr Gert G?