Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Bold intervention needed in fishermen’s strike

Home Letters Bold intervention needed in fishermen’s strike

Like the Affirmative Repositioning movement earlier this year, another grassroots movement – a product of institutions not doing their work fairly – is busy shaping up.

I am referring to the striking fisheries workers. President Hage Geingob had to intervene for reasons explained below. The ministry of labour’s inspectorate of labour services has for nearly a decade not provided sustainable protection for all employees at their workplaces and does not enforce fair labour relations, as required by the Labour Act of 2007.

The current situation could have been avoided if the process was supervised and controlled in the spirit of “tripartitism ” – involving representatives of the ministry, the unions and employers. However, this does not function in Namibia for a number of reasons.

Firstly, in my personal experiences the ministry ignored throughout the years the principles of the Public Service Charter provisions, like quality of service, transparency, information and accessibility. The detailed findings and facts to that were reported by the undersigned to the offices of the ombudsman and the prime minister at the times, but no action was taken.

Employees today don`t trust the directorate of labour services in general. They feel betrayed by labour inspectors, who are often suspected of siding with employers and who are not guided by any code of conduct.

The more than 40 fragmented and mostly cash-strapped workers’ unions represent less than 20% of employees and have not at any stage played a significant role in representing employees with their grievances in tripartitism, because the ministry dominates the proceedings.

Also, the representatives of the employers’ organisations are left with no real counterparts in tripartitism. The striking fishermen with their substantial grievances need our support.

Uwe Rathmann