Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

We bungled the visa report

Home Editorial We bungled the visa report

Our article last Friday about Namibia’s new visa requirements caused quite a stir – to the extent that our country was overzealously congratulated for what many had dubbed a ‘revolutionary’ step in the right direction. The article, drawn from a State House media statement in which government announced the country’s new visa requirement relief, suggested that all Africans coming to Namibia would no longer be required to produce visas. Yet the statement was clear as daylight that in fact only African holders of diplomatic or official passports are exempted from such requirements. Simply put, we bottled it.

We have let down our esteemed readers and all stakeholders on the day, and they have reacted in force, as they should have. We accept their judgment and embrace the calls for heightened awareness and a higher standard when dealing with facts of news. Throughout the history of our existence, we have strived to inform Namibians – and indeed our foreign readers – timely, correctly and objectively because these are the tenets of journalism we believe should never be compromised under whatever circumstances. But we must also be brave enough to shoulder the burden of our mistakes – especially when schoolboy mistakes on a matter so straightforward are made.
Reporting the said news article in the manner we did is miles away from what would ordinarily be described as human error. We simply did not apply ourselves consciously and we unreservedly take full responsibility for this blip.
Internal corrective measures – agreed to with the Board, have been taken and the identified loopholes in the system plugged.
We seek no expedience of any sort with this apology but that readers would continue to treat us as the prime source of trustful news regarding happenings in Namibia. – Editor