Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Puma, Nabta land ruling postponed

Home National Puma, Nabta land ruling postponed
Puma, Nabta land ruling postponed

Maria Amakali

The judgment to determine the ownership of a piece of land on which Puma Energy Namibia and the Namibia Bus and Taxi Association (Nabta) have been operating for years, has been postponed to next week.

High Court acting judge Philanda Christiaan postponed the ruling to 13 October citing it was not ready.

Puma is seeking an order from the High Court to evict Nabta and local businesswoman Ruusa Andunge from the premises on which they are all operating. 

They are further demanding payment in the amounts of N$45 550 and N$5 000, respectively for damages per month of unlawful occupation for the three years preceding the date of service of summons.  On 3 February 1993, Caltex Oil Namibia, now renamed Puma Energy Namibia, entered into a joint venture agreement with Nabta in respect of the said piece of land.

According to the agreement, the parties would pursue negotiations with Windhoek municipality to acquire land to set up offices and a service station for Nabta – to be executed by Caltex.

The agreement further indicates no negotiations would be carried outside of the joint venture agreement. The parties agreed for Christoph van Niekerk, from Southern Estates to act as a facilitator and spokesperson. In papers filed in the High Court, Puma is claiming on 9 March 1995, Caltex entered into a franchise agreement with Nabta.

The franchise agreement was for the period of 1 November 1994 to 31 October 1997. As a result, Puma claims Nabta’s right to stay on the property came to an end. However, Nabta has refused to vacate.

Nabta is however claiming that Puma, with the help of Van Niekerk, obtained the land dubiously.

Joseph Rukoro, who was employed as the national retail manager for Puma Energy Namibia from November 2011 to July 2018 and subsequently became franchisee and owner of Puma Hedanava Service Station claims that Puma Energy Namibia started operating as Caltex Oil Namibia which later changed its name to Puma Energy Namibia Two.

Rukoro claims Puma Energy Namibia Two holds the title deeds to the Erf 7305, where Puma service is located in Rhino Park, Windhoek. 

He claims the land was bought from Southern Realty International. Puma Energy Namibia started operating as Caltex Oil Namibia, which later changed its name to Puma Energy Namibia Two. 

Although he admitted that on 3 February 1993, the parties entered into a “joint venture” in respect of the said piece of land, the terms of the said agreement were “nothing more than an unenforceable agreement”. 

He claims the agreement stipulates that the parties have the right to further negotiate with outside parties to acquire land. 

However, the documents filed before court indicate no negotiations would be carried outside of the joint venture agreement. 

-mamakali@nepc.com.na