We value your privacy

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.

Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

National

‘Security Council seat meaningless without veto power’

2024-09-272024-09-27By Correspondent
‘Security Council seat meaningless without veto power’

Andreas Thomas 

The United States’ proposal to support two new permanent seats on the influential UN Security Council, without veto power, is a disingenuous attempt to maintain Africa’s marginalisation.

The US ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, reaffirmed her government’s position on expanding the Security Council in a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations on 13 September 2024.
The non-accord of veto power to African permanent representatives in the Security Council has elicited mixed reactions, particularly within the continent.

Former Namibian ambassador to the United Nations, Kaire Mbuende, described the proposal as an attempt to maintain a dual-class membership system within the Security Council.
“Our position has always been either you abolish veto power so everybody there can be a permanent member without veto power, or you extend veto power to those new members on the Security Council.
“We cannot have two classes of members of the Security Council, one with veto powers, one without. That is totally unacceptable,” he told Nampa on Tuesday.
“That has been the African position, and the position of Namibia, that veto power be abolished because we think in many cases, it is undemocratic,” he added.

The reform of the UN Security Council has become one of the most debated issues leading up to the Summit of the Future, held on 22-23 September 2024 in New York.
Former UN assistant secretary general for political affairs Tuliameni Kalomoh said the proposal for an African permanent seat without veto power is an attempt to appease Africans.
“This is a form of appeasement, particularly coming from the United States, designed to mislead African public opinion, because there has been a surge of anti-Americanism in West and Central Africa. So, it is an attempt at appeasement they are proposing,” said Kalomoh, who also served as Namibian ambassador to the United States.

“Our position is one for equality of all permanent members of the Security Council that Africa’s position is encapsulated in the Ezulwini Consensus,” he said.
It has been two decades since the African Union adopted the Ezulwini Consensus, in which its member states called for two permanent seats on the UN Security Council.

-Nampa

MENU