Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Namibia’s upper middle classification worries Shifeta

Home National Namibia’s upper middle classification worries Shifeta

Albertina Nakale

WINDHOEK – Minister of Environment and Tourism Pohamba Shifeta, expressed concern about the classification of Namibia as an upper middle-income country and the new co-financing requirements that may result in the reduction of resources allocated to Namibia to fund climate change mitigation activities.

According to the World Bank, Namibia is classified as an upper middle-income country, with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of around US$5700 at current exchange rates.

Shifeta who is in Vietnam for the 6th Assembly of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), said the continued reliance on GDP-derived indicators masks the stark past inequalities that continue to define the Namibian society as well as that of some of its neighbours.

“This overlooks the vulnerability of the majority of our population and is to the detriment of our rural communities whose livelihoods are so gravely threatened by climate change, biodiversity loss and land degradation and who are in greatest need of support,” Shifeta expressed.

The meeting aims to help strengthen capacity on protecting natural resources and environment, including the implementation of the Paris Agreement at the Paris climate conference (COP21) in December 2015 and sustainable development goals of the United Nations. 

He therefore called on GEF to continue to deliver necessary project grants to all developing countries in the spirit of the common but differentiated responsibility principles as adopted in the Rio Declaration.
This he says will be critical for Namibia to attain the ambitious targets it has set for itself such as the Aichi Targets, the Nationally Determined Contributions and the Land Degradation Neutrality targets.

The Aichi 2020 Targets, under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), aim to halt the loss of biodiversity by 2020, in order to ensure that ecosystems continue to provide essential services.

To date, Shifeta said Namibia has been able to implement over 30 national projects worth approximately US$71 million (approximately N$923 million) and has participated in 33 regional and global projects.
He noted these projects have been an enormous help to Namibia in catalysing innovations and best practice approaches in the areas of biodiversity management, climate change adaptation and mitigation and sustainable land management.

“We have also gained considerable experience over the course of implementing these projects in terms of what has and what has not worked,” he said.

He requested for the GEF to open up opportunities for the accreditation of national implementing agencies as is being done to good effect by the Green Climate Fund.
He viewed that this will be the best approach to strengthen capacities and the long-term benefits and impacts to developing countries from the GEF and will ensure better efficiency and effectiveness in overall implementation.