Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

BIG coalition questions poverty fight measures

Home National BIG coalition questions poverty fight measures
BIG coalition questions poverty fight measures

The Basic Income Grant (BIG) Coalition of Namibia has criticised new poverty eradication measures announced by President Hage Geingob during last week’s State of the Nation Address. 

Geingob last week hinted government would consolidate and modify the ongoing food bank initiative, marginalised grant and feeding scheme, instead of introducing a basic income grant. 

To this, the coalition’s activist Rinaani Musutua claimed the Head of State was still basing his poverty eradication measures and legacy on outdated welfare programmes. 

Musutua, in a statement on Friday, said Geingob’s poverty eradication measures are “irrelevant and have made very little impact to the current situation”. 

“The President’s stance bears hallmarks of a poorly planned and unsustainable HPP ll, especially in regard to Pillar 3 (social progression), which states that the food bank will be converted into a BIG scheme, where only the previous food bank recipients would-be beneficiaries,” Musutua said. 

She added that the coalition finds it problematic, as only 42 000 recipients will benefit from BIG – perpetuating the systemic exclusion of most Namibians in need. 

“The President is yet to inform us about the fate of the rest of the 799 958 people who are currently facing hunger,” she said. 

She said poverty levels have become a humanitarian crisis in the past five years, adding that two-thirds of Namibians live below the poverty line (US$1.90 per day as per international standards) and unemployment is at a peak high of about 45-50%. 

“If the food bank was successful, why do we still have people who scavenge for food at rubbish dump sites and in bins on a daily basis? Basing BIG on welfare programmes that haven’t reached their targets or lack the necessary political will to achieve such targets while only benefiting very few recipients creates frustrated and disenfranchised communities,” she said. 

“It also prepares for a scenario that will engulf our entire democracy and set us on a path of social disintegration. The president’s intervention is not a measurable indicator in tackling the problem, and it downplays the magnitude of poverty in our country.” 

Proponents of the BIG initiative have been agitating for a monthly cash payment of N$500 for people aged 19 to 59. 

The coalition last year re-launched the universal BIG campaign, citing the grant will have long-term social protection relief to afford Namibians basic human necessities. 

ktjitemisa@nepc.com.na