Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Sinvula, Grootfontein tussle ruling in January

Home National Sinvula, Grootfontein tussle ruling in January
Sinvula, Grootfontein tussle ruling in January

The Gr o o t f o n t e i n municipality claims the suit filed against it by its suspended CEO, Kisco Sinvula is an attempt to cover up serious allegations against him. 

The council is of the view that Sinvula’s purpose to institute review proceedings is to use the court to aid him in covering up the serious allegations of impropriety levelled against him. 

“The applicant’s aim is simple. It is this: he must not be investigated; the council must not inquire into the serious allegations of impropriety and maladministration against him,” said the council’s lawyer Eliaser Nekwaya. 

Sinvula in May approached the High Court to review and set aside the council’s decision to suspend him on 24 March and further appoint Henry Shimutwikeni as the investigator in his case. 

At the time of his suspension, he was furnished with a notice for a disciplinary hearing on 30 counts of misconduct. 

These allegations range from insubordination, abuse of power, violations of the Local Authorities Act, violations of the Procurement Act, corruption, forgery, misleading and misrepresentation of facts, negligent trading, utterance and violations of the labour law, racketeering and the misuse of public funds. 

Nekwaya has asked the court to dismiss Sinvula’s application, stating that it was filed after the 30-day rule and he failed to give reasons why his application was filed late. 

Furthermore, they lawfully suspended him and Shimutwikeni was appointed to investigate as authorised by the Local Authorities Act. 

Sinvula, through his lawyer James Diedericks, is adamant that his suspension was illegal as council acted outside its powers. 

According to Diedericks, the law surrounding the disciplinary hearing of CEOs and head of departments is different. It dictates that the minister is responsible for designating a person that must act as chairperson of any disciplinary committee established in relation to adjudicating allegations of misconduct against a CEO of a municipality. 

He said this was not the case in Sinvula’s matter. Thus, the court should set aside Sinvula’s suspension and the appointment of Shimutwikeni. 

Judge Boas Usiku will give a ruling on 26 January 2023. 

– mamakali@nepc.com.na