Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

No luck for cattle thief

Home Crime and Courts No luck for cattle thief

By Roland Routh

WINDHOEK – A Zambian national previously convicted on a charge of stock theft in the Regional Court in Katima Mulilo on Monday failed to get his appeal going.

Simataa Simataa lodged an appeal against a sentence of six years’ imprisonment he received in the Katima Mulilo Regional Court for the theft of three head of cattle in 2011.
He lodged an appeal against the sentence only.

After State Advocate Jack Eixab told the court no grounds for appeal were clearly set out as required by the Magistrate Court Rules and neither did the appellant point out one material error or misdirection made by the magistrate when the sentence was imposed, Appeal Judges Elton Hoff and Naomi Shivute ordered the appeal be struck off the roll.

Eixab also had a problem with the late filing of the notice to appeal.

He said Simataa was sentenced on July 05, 2011 and only lodged his appeal on October 21, 2013, more than too late.
Simataa argued a fine should have been imposed as he suffers from a heart condition and has five children to raise.

He also stated he is young and intends to proceed with his education.
Judge Hoff who wrote the judgment in concurrence with Judge Shivute said that grounds of appeal “must be set out clearly and specifically,” and that since no grounds of appeal had been set out by the appellant, there was no attack on the sentence imposed and thus there was no appeal against the sentence.

For this reason alone the matter should be struck from the role, the judges emphasised.

In respect of the late filing of the appeal, the judges said that while Simataa did file a condonation application stating that he did not understand well what an appeal was, it appeared from the court role that his right to appeal was explained to him and that he understood the explanation.

According to Judge Hoff, the fact Simataa stated in his affidavit that he wanted to leave everything in God’s hands appeared to him that Simataa accepted the sentence.

He said he saw no reasonable prospects of success on the appeal.