Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Ruling on age application today

Home National Ruling on age application today
Ruling on age application today

Windhoek High Court Judge Boas Usiku will deliver his ruling on an application by former minister of justice Sakeus Shanghala, his friend and business partner James Hatuikulipi and Pius Mwatelulo for consent to lodge an application to challenge acting Judge Kobus Miller’s appointment as acting judge because of his advanced age.

The Namibian Constitution stipulates that a sitting judge may not be over the age of 70. As such, they said they are afraid that Judge Miller will not see the trial through to the end. In their application, they cited Judge Miller and Judge President Petrus Damaseb.

While it was an unopposed motion, Judge Usiku decided that instead of issuing an order immediately, he would postpone the matter for a ruling.

Shanghala and co are asking the High Court to allow them to institute an application to set aside as unconstitutional the appointment by the President, on or about 19 January 2023, of the second respondent (Miller) as an acting judge of the high court.  In papers filed in support of their application, they aver that Miller is already 75 years old, being born in January 1948. In several letters written to the President, the Judge President, Deputy Judge President and the Government Attorney, the lawyers of the applicants set out the reasons for their application. In the letters, they aver that Judge Miller’s appointment as acting judge is not in line with Article 82(3) of the Constitution. 

Article 82(3) precludes the appointment of a person as an acting judge after the person has reached the age of 70, they submitted. They said Miller was 74 when appointed, and turned 75 soon after. In the result, they say the appointment of Miller as acting judge is unconstitutional, and should be set aside. They base their assertion on the provisions of Article 82, which governs the appointment of judges and acting judges by the President. The Attorney General, however, indicated that they will oppose any application by Shanghala and co for the removal of Judge Miller from the bench, especially since he is scheduled to preside over the Fishrot trial. 

The AG stated that the appointment of Miller is consistent with the Constitution and the law. Several attempts by the Fishrot accused to have Judge Miller recuse himself from the trial for perceived bias was met with failure. The applicants are represented by Murorua, Kurz and Kasper.

-rrouth@nepc.com.na